3 Reasons to Kill the Dept. of Homeland Security

By Meredith Bragg & Nick Gillespie

It’s unnecessary, ineffective, and expensive. And that’s just for starters.

Sunday, November 25, 2012 marks the 10th anniversary of the creation of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), which pulled together nearly two dozen federal agencies and departments under the control of new, single entity. Its responsibilities include running the US Border Patrol, the Plum Island Animal Disease Center, and FEMA.

DHS is the third biggest cabinet agency, but are we better off because of its existence?

Here are three reasons to get rid of DHS.

1. It’s unnecessary. In the months immediately following September 11 attacks in 2001, President George W. Bush initially resisted calls to create a new high-level bureaucracy that would be laid on top of current activities. He was right to recognize that coordinating existing agencies would have been smarter and better. Unfortunately, he caved in to pressure to create a massive new department.

3 Reasons to Kill the Dept. of Homeland Security [continued]


A free, once–weekly e-mail round-up of liberty news, articles and activism.