Colorado Sheriffs Join Another Lawsuit Against Anti-Gun Laws

By Robert Bocziewicz

Colorado sheriffsGun-rights advocates, including most of Colorado’s sheriffs, are renewing their fight against the state’s two new gun-control laws.

They filed a court notice this past Monday stating they are appealing a judge’s decision that the laws comply with the U.S. Constitution. Chief U.S. District Judge Marcia Krieger in Denver ruled June 26, the laws are constitutional. 

One law bans firearms magazines, acquired after July 1, 2013, of more than 15 rounds. The other expands background checks to include transfer of guns from one person to another.

Colorado sheriffs join another lawsuit against anti-gun laws [continued]


A free, once–weekly e-mail round-up of liberty news, articles and activism.



  • Leroy Blankenship

    The USSC has already ruled that it is not Law Enforcement’s job to Protect and Serve, (their job is to enforce the laws), now with that said, if courts continue to chip away at the Constitution’s 2nd Amendment just how do the courts expect The People to defend themselves if it is not the government’s job?

  • Stargazer

    Obviously, this district judge does not know the U.S. Constitution!

  • toodorky

    “Let the cowboys ride against the wind” thank you Bob Seger

  • 861239

    there are numerous Administrative court rulings that are proving that ALL state and Federal GOVERNMENT OFFICES are VACATED and are nothing more than corporations.

    I challenge you to get this information. American people and the world need to know this so we can stop the tyranny that is upon this American people and hold these imposters accountable just like they did in the Nuremberg Trials.

    The Fact of the matter is that everyone who claims to be a “us citizen” is in fact an enemy of the State and is exactly why the American people are being stalked, harassed and kidnapped in the judicial system and charged with “War Crimes”. This was done on March 9, 1933 by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and the corrupt President of the US Corp and is proven by Congressional Records. You have to have a “license” to do anything for it to be “legal”.

    Ron Paul knows this and so does Rand Paul but they dare not tell of it. So who will?

    The Act of March 9, 1933, Section 2 amended this to include “any person within the United States or any place subject to the jurisdiction thereof”. It was here that every American citizen literally became an enemy to the United States government under declaration. This was instigated by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York on March 3, 1933 with Proclamation 2039. Not only did this make Americans enemies of the state, but it also made international people enemies of the United States by forcing countries to take on “federal reserve notes”.


    “Rodney Class vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, NO. 07-5026 (2007) where the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals defined/styled all Defendants as “CORPORATE APPELLEES,” the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA being the main Defendant in this action; see also,

    Rodney Class vs. North Carolina DOT and the Dallas, NC Police Dept., 10 DOT 7047 (2010) – the Office of Administrative Hearings (Raleigh) decided that the Dallas Police Dept are private contractors “NOT” a State agency under the State of North Carolina Law enforcement; see also,

    Rodney Class vs. North Carolina DOT and the Dallas Police Dept. under Administrative Judicial Review (Raleigh) 11 CVS 1559 (2011) also decided that the Dallas Police Dept. are private contractors “NOT” a State agency under State of North Carolina Law enforcement;

    Rodney Class vs. North Carolina Tax Dept., 12 REV 05184 (2012) the Office of Administrative Hearings (Raleigh) decided that the Tax Dept. was “NOT” a State agency and that the employees are
    “private individuals”; and see

    Rodney Class vs. North Carolina Dept. of Justice 11 DOJ 09708 (2011) the Office of Administrative Hearings (Raleigh) decided that the NC DOJ and the Defendants are “NOT” a State Agency or Agents under the State of North Carolina, and the latest:

    North Carolina Administrative case against the North Carolina State Highway Patrol Employee Kyle M. Adkins, 14 GOV 3404 (2014), “Not” a State agency employee;

    AND ALSO see the current action contemplated in Mass. wherein the ACLU re: Mass. SWAT (2014) that Mass. SWAT admitted/purported in a public document that it (SWAT) is “NOT” an arm of law enforcement but a “private corporation.”

    Link to the final decision issued by the ACLU regarding the SWAT team and what their standing is in government.

    • patriot 100%

      Then if they are not part of the government one must conclude they have no authority over us and we CAN shoot them (with full impunity) if we are threatened in ANY WAY.

      Title 18 part 1 section 241 of the United States Code of Law.

      “Each person has the right to resist an unlawful arrest. In such a case, the person attempting the arrest stands in the position of a wrongdoer and may be resisted by the use of force, as in self- defense.” (State v. Mobley, 240 N.C. 476, 83 S.E. 2d 100)

      “One may come to the aid of another being unlawfully arrested, just as he may where one is being assaulted, molested, raped or kidnapped. Thus it is not an offense to liberate one from the unlawful custody of an officer, even though he may have submitted to such custody, without resistance.” (Adams v. State, 121 Ga. 16, 48 S.E. 910)

      Only the government has the power to arrest someone.


    Even the Piece of Shit , Governor , Obama’s Boot Licker , Said He Made a Mistake , Signing The Bill . Its Going To Be His Famous Last Words . We Are Going To Kick The Piece of Work , To The Curb